Compliance & Quality Assurance.

Help reviewers focus on cases that need attention. A scoped assistant checks records against your documented procedures, links potential issues to evidence, and prepares a review queue for your specialists.

DeliveryScoped pilot, then rollout
Integrations to considerCase systems · Policies · Audit logs
Success measuresReview time · Reviewer agreement

Connected steps.
Clear responsibilities.

We start with a narrow review task and an agreed checklist. Automated checks surface potential issues; trained reviewers validate findings and retain responsibility for decisions.

Agent 01
Case Intake
Collect · Minimise
+

Collects only the approved case or interaction records needed for the review, with source references and access controls.

Tools
Case-management APIAccess controlsData minimisation
Agent 02
Policy Mapper
Version · Checklist
+

Selects the relevant approved procedure and policy version, then maps the review to an explicit checklist.

Tools
Versioned policiesReview checklistRule mapping
Agent 03
Checker
Completeness · Consistency
+

Checks missing fields, skipped steps, and potential inconsistencies. Every flag retains its supporting evidence.

Tools
Structured rulesEvidence retrievalConsistency checks
Agent 04
Review Queue
Evidence · Human decision
+

Prepares the findings for a trained reviewer to accept, reject, or investigate. It does not make regulated or high-impact decisions.

Tools
Reviewer queueSource linksDecision record
Agent 05
Audit Summary
Record · Trends
+

Records reviewer outcomes and policy versions, then summarises recurring issues to support training and audit preparation.

Tools
Audit trailTrend reportsReview history
Agent 00
Orchestrator
Coordinate · Log
+

Coordinates the agreed workflow, retries failed integrations, and records handoffs so staff can inspect what happened.

Tools
Workflow stateRetry policyActivity log

A case is ready for review.
The evidence is ready too.

Illustrative workflow: a completed support case is checked against an approved QA checklist. A missing verification step is flagged with the relevant source and policy version. A reviewer checks the evidence and records the outcome.

example trace · illustrative workflowsimulation
Orchestrator
Supervisor · State machine
coordinating handoffs
Case Intake
Collect · Minimise
idle
Policy Mapper
Version · Checklist
idle
Checker
Completeness · Consistency
idle
Review Queue
Evidence · Human decision
idle
Audit Summary
Record · Trends
idle
Orchestrator
Supervisor · State machine
coordinating handoffs
agents
Case Intake
Collect · Minimise
idle
Policy Mapper
Version · Checklist
idle
Checker
Completeness · Consistency
idle
Review Queue
Evidence · Human decision
idle
Audit Summary
Record · Trends
idle

What we need from you.

📋
A narrow review task

One documented checklist or procedure and a clear definition of what the assistant should flag.

📁
Reviewed examples

Representative cases with reviewer decisions, including examples of acceptable exceptions.

🔒
Data and access rules

Approved data sources, retention requirements, reviewer access, and the records permitted in the workflow.

👤
A specialist owner

A qualified reviewer who validates findings, measures false positives, and owns all consequential decisions.

From kick-off to live.

01
Scope
Discovery

Map the current process, confirm integration access, and agree the pilot boundaries and success measures.

02
Build
Agreed after discovery

Connect the agreed sources and tools, configure business rules, and prepare the staff handoff.

03
Validate
Pilot

Test representative and exception cases with your team. Review quality and permissions before expanding access.

04
Roll out
After pilot review

Launch the agreed scope with monitoring, named owners, and a maintenance plan. Timing depends on integrations and review needs.

Start with one auditable review workflow.

Book a scoping call to define the checklist, evidence requirements, and human review process. We will assess fit before agreeing a pilot.